International Court of Justice Judges

The International Court of Justice has named 18 judges to hear the matter in which the Zambian Opposition United Party for National Development [UPND] leader Hakainde Hichilema and his running mate Geoffrey Bwalya Mwamba are challenging the Election victory of Edgar C. Lungu and Inonge M. Wina.

The judges will hear the petition and if the UPND has overwhelming evidence, Edgar Lungu and other ECZ officials will be arrested for coup.

Also the Intenational court of justice will arrest the opposition leader if he has no evidence of rigging by the Patriotic front and ECZ officials.

Zambian judges failed to pass judgement on this matter after being divided and being corrupted by the PF party using high top officials like the likes of Kaizer Zulu.

Here is the list
THE NAMES OF 18 JUDGES WHO WILL BE HEARING THE CASE OF UPND AT INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE ( ICJ ) IN NOVEMBER :
1. Rene Blattman from Bolivia
2. Maureen Harding Clark from Ireland
3. Fatoumata Dembele Diarra from. Mali
4. Adrian Fulford from the United Kingdom
5. Karl T. Hudson-Phillips from Trinidad and Tobago
6. Claude Jorda from France
7. Hans-Peter Kaul from Germany
8. Philippe Kirsch from Canada (PRESIDENT)
9. Erkki Kourula from Finland
10. Akua Kuenyehia from Ghana (First Vice-President)
11. Elizabeth Odio Benito from Costa Rica (Second Vice- President)
12. Gheorghios M. Pikis from Cyprus
13. Navanethem Pillay from South Africa
14. Mauro Politi from Italy
15. Tuiloma Neroni Slade from Samoa
16. Sang-hyun Song from the Republic of Korea
17. Sylvia H. de Figueiredo Steiner from Brazil
18. Anita Usacka from Latvia

LATEST NEWS

91 COMMENTS

    • David Tembo winning presidential election has nothing to do with how many MPs one has. Chongwe for instance voted for a PF MP, but presidential HH won beating ECL. Besides in 2011 PF had less MPs the majority were from the opposition. That is why they induced by elections to beef up numbers in parliament. So mukamba chani, we were not born yesterday.

    • In 2001, Levy Mwanawasa won the Presidency but lost Parliament to the opposition. Lusaka, Western, North Western, Southern and Central went to UPND while Eastern went to UNIP and FDD. Levy only had MPs from the northern half of the country. Learn to research sir.

    • We have already two precedence set.Startingly in Australia and Ivory coast .In Ivory coast the incubent was there for six months in the office after the disputed election.But after verdict of internation courts was passed, which he was found wanting,and was removed. The right winner was handed over with power.As well as Australia the wrong person was removed after conclusively dealing with all court processes. ICJ order him to vacate the office and pave way to the right elected person.It is also worth to note that zambia is a signotory to ICC and ICJ ,meaning is bound to abid to the final verdict of these two institutions.These two institutions have power to use force and sactions where necessary and it is within their reach.Subsquently,I do believe mr Lungu will respect the final verdict of the aforementioned courts.As you know in courts hieracs”sp” the concourt is mandated to deal with election petitions and constitutional matters and it is on the level supreme court.

    • And us who have been robbed of victory are not Zambians? Stop embarrassing itself u chaps. I have actually heard alot from pf raven that they not accept the icc ruling, anyhow, which court has no law enforcers? Once they say move out, u just have to, coz our military is a puppy to the icc military. Wait et cry nicely when all is said and done. U may wish to buy a cable for suicide before time comes.

    • We have already two precedence set.Startingly in Australia and Ivory coast .In Ivory coast the incubent was there for six months in the office after the disputed election.But after verdict of internation courts was passed, which he was found wanting,and was removed. The right winner was handed over with power.As well as Australia the wrong person was removed after conclusively dealing with all court processes. ICJ order him to vacate the office and pave way to the right elected person.It is also worth to note that zambia is a signotory to ICC and ICJ ,meaning is bound to abid to the final verdict of these two institutions.These two institutions have power to use force and sactions where necessary and it is within their reach.Subsquently,I do believe mr Lungu will respect the final verdict of the aforementioned courts.As you know in courts hieracs”sp” the concourt is mandated to deal with election petitions and constitutional matters and it is on the level supreme court.

    • We have already two precedence set.Startingly in Australia and Ivory coast .In Ivory coast the incubent was there for six months in the office after the disputed election.But after verdict of internation courts was passed, which he was found wanting,and was removed. The right winner was handed over with power.As well as Australia the wrong person was removed after conclusively dealing with all court processes. ICJ order him to vacate the office and pave way to the right elected person.It is also worth to note that zambia is a signotory to ICC and ICJ ,meaning is bound to abid to the final verdict of these two institutions.These two institutions have power to use force and sactions where necessary and it is within their reach.Subsquently,I do believe mr Lungu will respect the final verdict of the aforementioned courts.As you know in courts hieracs”sp” the concourt is mandated to deal with election petitions and constitutional matters and it is on the level supreme court.

    • David Tembo the results you is what ecz gave us but all of us don’t know what results or evidence the upnd ve so since judges in Zambia refused to look at the case let in icc look at it if they find that ECL won then he ll continue his duties and if not then the rightful winner should be sworn in simple

    • We have already two precedence set.Startingly in Australia and Ivory coast .In Ivory coast the incubent was there for six months in the office after the disputed election.But after verdict of internation courts was passed, which he was found wanting,and was removed. The right winner was handed over with power.As well as Australia the wrong person was removed after conclusively dealing with all court processes. ICJ order him to vacate the office and pave way to the right elected person.It is also worth to note that zambia is a signotory to ICC and ICJ ,meaning is bound to abid to the final verdict of these two institutions.These two institutions have power to use force and sactions where necessary and it is within their reach.Subsquently,I do believe mr Lungu will respect the final verdict of the aforementioned courts.As you know in courts hieracs”sp” the concourt is mandated to deal with election petitions and constitutional matters and it is on the level supreme court.

  1. My name is Boago Mosung I Never believed i was ever going to be HIV Negative again,Dr Abumen has given me reasons to be happy, i was HIV positive for 12years and all the means i tried for treatment was not helpful to me, but when i came on the Internet i saw great testimony about Dr Abumen on how he was able to cure someone from HIV, this person said great things about this man, and advice we contact him for any Disease problem that Dr Abumen can be of help, well i decided to give him a try, he requested for my information which i sent to him, and he told me he is going to prepare herbal medicine, for me which i we take for some days and after i should go back to the hospital for check up, well after taking all the treatment sent to me by Dr Abumen i went back to the Hospital for check up, and now i have been confirmed HIV Negative, friends you can reach Dr Abumen on any treatment for any Disease he is the one only i can show you all up to, reach him on DR ABUMEN on his email.([email protected]) call or whatsapp him +2347085071418.

  2. Tembo uliciyanga. Petition has nothing to do with membership in parliament. Evidence is there. That man from uganda with ECZ password will testify, Esau Chulu and his wrong figures will answer, Mwamba and his gen 12 heading north will also explain and campaigning using public resources just to remind you tembo. Concourt refused to table that fearing what the outcome would be.

  3. Lies ba Observer the İCC comprises 18 judges in all, and not all of them sit to hear one case. İt has no mandate to hear election disputes, it has jurisdication to prosecute individuals for the international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes.
    Article 7 of the İCC-
    Crimes against humanity:
    Article 7 defines Crimes against humanity as acts committed as part of widespread or systematic attack
    directed against any civillian population, with knowledge of the attack.
    Did this happen somewhere in Zambia ? The İCC will only initiate proceedıngs in a case with sufficient gravity to justify action by the court.

    • ba mwewa bushe the sku you went to they tought you how see words without reading & undastanding what you read,sure even a blind man can tel tel you the zambian observer has writen INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE(ICJ) not INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT(ICC),did your teachers who tought you had a proper eye sight.mmmmh am fred & u sound more cadre than chishimba kambwili & frank bwalya.luk at what the zambian obseva & what you have writen if it the same wetha you abreviat it.

    • Zambian observer Mr Mweemba you liars İCJ has 15 judges not 18 and not all sit on all sit at one hearing.
      İCJ handles contentious jurisdictions between member states of the United Nations whose ruling is binding.
      İt also provides Advisory jurisdiction and their opinion which is not binding.
      İt has no mandate to handle election disputes among member countries of the United Nations, if it has mention the Article. You seem to be ignorant of the role of the İCJ and its purpose may be you just hear the name.
      The İCC is right place because “Crimes against humanity” were committed but the question is, what was the gravity to initiate proceedings ?
      İn short İCJ deals with disputes among member states of the UN mainly of economic interests and it has never in its history dealt with election disputes. The UN general assembly could have been informed and we all could have been aware if there was such a unique case against Zambia which is outside the jurisdiction of the İCJ.
      İ am dull but not the dullest because i attended schools in the villages, a villager will understand what i meant in earlier my earlier comment. Go to İCC.

  4. We need Justice to prevail, the UPND has got overwhelming evidence’s to show the ICJ and I don’t know what the pf if they will present the constutional judges as witness in this matter.it is gud the case is still on paka litete

  5. All election complaints or petitions are handled by concourt of that particular country and within 14 days Anything done outside these stipulated lines is nothing but mere drama entertainment. It’s good to entertain people but at the end you become a fool hardy and a laughing stalk.

    • sendoi just to help u on that my dear, the answer is a big YESS reason being the case is for zambia,just lyk the debts zambia owes other countries go in the ministry of finance you find record.so judgment from ICC or ICJ wil also be record in both audio & vedio records in the high court or suprem court of zambia for proves in the next generation.

    • I ask if the judgement will be registered I.e recognized in Zambian courts. An example is FTJ corruption case in the London court. It was not registered in Zambia that’s why it didn’t hold any water. Won’t it be the same with ICC

  6. Tell them to try President Putin and Syrian President and others because no one from Zambia will attend. Zambia is independent state and it has its own Constitution made by Zambians. Five years is not too far , start reorganising your parties or else you will be caught pants down.

    • You dont seem to understand us. We are deliberately avoiding going back to the drawing board so we can run away from the issue of party convention. Meanwhile we can buy time by following these court cases. What is worse, our creditors may be on us if we stop following up thses court cases.Atleast we are giving them hope that the elections may nullified and we can be leaders soon.

  7. that court is now going through our zambian constitution and not icc constitution. waba, waba, 14 days you waist peoples time without evidence, muli vipuba? simple logic ,Hh is playing on ur mind by making u think he is seeking justice. hh is avoiding a conversion. he ll kip jumping from court to court, 5 years nipafupi till 2021 campaign shall start, ndiye slogan. ooowe bandibida ma voti !!!!!!kikiki

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here